# Guidelines and Improvement of Proposal Process **URL:** \ **Category:** VeBetterDAO\ **Tags:** vebetterdao\ **Created:** [July 31, 2024, 4:41am UTC](https://vechain.discourse.group/t/guidelines-and-improvement-of-proposal-process/133 "2024-07-31T04:41:39Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 4
**Author:** ![favo](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/vechain.discourse.group/favo/32/672_2.png) [@favo](https://vechain.discourse.group/u/favo)\ **Post date:** [August 1, 2024, 6:32pm UTC](https://vechain.discourse.group/t/guidelines-and-improvement-of-proposal-process/133/4 "2024-08-01T18:32:26Z")
At first it reads good too. What I like is that it enforces a discussion with the first phase and iterating on it before going to a full vote. My thoughts after reading it: It allows (and enforces) time to discuss, which is what we miss. 1. Maybe we can adopt from project /issue management some processes, especially requirements to the proposal input. Like templating with questions similar to “what is the problem?”, “the expected outcome?”, “how to measure it?”, etc. – disconnected from a solution. So we can think freely about the problem to solve, instead of the solution to realize. 2. Suggestions for solutions can be multiple, so allowing different suggestions from different people and finding a way to prioritize or prefer one via voting too. This could also work as an alternative of a temperature check, by checking the participation level. 3. Iterating until a certain point is reached, where it moves to voting stage. The proposal must be realizable, tangible and measurable. * * * In general I think that a proposal should be a lot like a change request to an application. I am not so used to DAOs and their decision making processes, are there more “good” examples out there? Where people are active and happy with the process? --- _[View the full topic](https://vechain.discourse.group/t/guidelines-and-improvement-of-proposal-process/133)._