[VeBetterDAO Proposal] One-time relief funding for grant projects

Problem

Due to the significant decline in token price, several grantees have raised concerns about the gap between the grant value at the time it was awarded and the current USD value of the tokens received.

Project Grant Awarded (B3TR) Token Price (date of award) USD Value (date of award) USD Value (assume current token price of $0.01001) Difference
ReUse 372,730 0.06706 25,000 3,731.03 -21,268.97
ScoopUp 434,982 0.06892 30,000 4,354.17 -25,645.83
B3TR Transit 442,938 0.06772 30,000 4,433.81 -25,566.19
B3DTIME 434,748 0.06898 30,000 4,351.83 -25,648.17
Sproutly 303,060 0.08246 30,000 3,033.63 -26,966.37
Zeloop 331,386 0.07846 26,000 3,317.17 -22,682.83
VeChain Energy 172,539 0.06955 12,000 1,727.12 -10,272.88
Bikademy 440,350 0.06904 30,000 4,407.90 -25,592.10
GronCard 715,671 0.02096 15,000 7,163.87 -7,836.13

^ The two rightmost columns are for illustration purposes only and show the difference in grant value based on today’s token price.

Under the current system, a fixed amount of B3TR is allocated from the treasury on-chain when a grant proposal is executed. Because the token amount is predetermined and committed upfront, it has not been possible to adjust payouts based on future price movements.

When the token price declines significantly, the USD value of the grant is reduced to a level where teams may no longer be able to cover their originally planned development costs.

Proposal Summary

Existing grantees will be eligible to receive additional relief funding from the treasury to address the difference between the grant’s original USD value (at the time of award) versus what the granted token amount is worth today.

This proposal suggests allocating a fixed sum from the DAO treasury to a wallet temporarily managed by the Foundation team. These funds will be deployed on a one-time basis for each project that actively continues to build meaningfully within the deployment period.

Relief funds will remain available for deployment until 1 Jun 2026. Any unused funds will be returned to the treasury.

Deployment Mechanics

Relief payouts are capped at up to 20% of the USD value of each grant. This totals $45,600 for the nine projects mentioned above. To provide a buffer for conversion, we propose allocating $50,000 from the treasury for relief funding.

This amount will be converted from B3TR tokens into USD stables at the current market price.

Every existing grant project may apply for this one-time relief payout by writing to grant@vechain.org during the applicable period. Projects may also choose not to participate if they do not require the funding, in which case their share will be treated as unused and returned to the treasury at the end of the relief deployment period.

Each request will be reviewed prior to approval, based on the following considerations:

1. Token price change

Is the current token price equal to or more than 30% lower than the original token price at which the grant was awarded?

  • If yes, the project qualifies for the top-up.
  • If no, the project may not receive a top-up.

2. Project activity and milestone delivery

Has the project remained consistently active (e.g. active users, user growth, etc.) and/or delivered a significant milestone during this period?

  • If yes, the project qualifies for the top-up.
  • If no, or if there are negative reports or feedback about the application, the project may not receive a top-up.

3. Community endorsement

Is the project currently endorsed by the community?

  • If yes, the project qualifies for the top-up.
  • If no, the project may not receive a top-up.

Payouts may be pro-rated, meaning a project may receive less than expected or no payout at all if it does not satisfy all the conditions above.

Payouts will be made to the wallet address specified in each project’s original grant proposal.

After the deployment period, the Foundation will publish a summary of the payouts awarded on Discourse. Any remaining funds from the $50,000 relief allocation will be returned to the treasury.

Rationale & Additional Notes

After extensive discussion, the Foundation opted for a simple one-time relief mechanism rather than a more complicated formula. This approach was chosen to avoid unnecessary complexity while still providing meaningful support to projects that have continued building and delivering in good faith.

The objective is to ensure that projects remain appropriately incentivized during a period of significant token price decline, without creating long-term dependency on the DAO treasury or the Foundation for additional funding support. By structuring the relief as a limited, one-time initiative, the proposal aims to strike a balance between supporting builders and maintaining responsible treasury stewardship.

This approach allows qualifying projects to receive support during periods of market volatility while maintaining clear expectations around continued delivery and progress. The payout cap also reflects a risk-sharing model, where market risk is shared between the project teams and the Foundation, while helping ensure that the initiative does not place unnecessary strain on the treasury.

This proposal is intended as a short-term measure to address the current situation. We will continue to explore a more sustainable, long-term approach together as a community.

2 Likes

Reuse in the list is also for illustrative purpose?

I believe the list is just to show what dApps were affected by this, but later it explains a dApp would need to be endorsed. If that’s the case, Reuse wouldn’t be eligible.

It brings up a good question, though. What about dApps that are either still in the process of building or haven’t gotten endorsed at all yet. Specifically speaking for Bikademy and Zeloop?

We haven’t heard any updates from the Bikademy team, but they don’t have a dApp up for endorsement. Would they be ineligible? And then for Zeloop, they are having a rough time getting endorsed. Would they be allowed because of their circumstances?

Correct. In their case, they could fall under voluntary non-participant and their share will naturally be returned to the treasury.

Bikademy has been in touch with the grant team and will be launching its new app in a few weeks. ZeLoop has also been consistently trying to engage our ecosystem, although endorsement support has remained low.

In both cases, they are likely to qualify for a prorated top-up to reflect their efforts and progress. We are open to any recommendations from the community on this matter.

This is a good idea, but i think the DAO should consider hedging against future price drops. Who knows if Trump sends ground troops into Iran there could be more price collapses… in which case grant people will come back to the DAO for more b3tr tokens. Perhaps the DAO should move some of the approved grant money into stable coins, and if unused, buy back b3tr later.